|
back to the index page
'Til the Fat Lady Sings
When It's Over
Like Yogi says: "It ain't over till it's over!" It happened a few days
ago... again. We tied to tell our client, a district manager, that he
needed to keep interviewing until he had three or four qualified candidates
to choose from, but he liked this one so much, he was sure he was going to
hire him... he thought. Well, his boss who also had to interview the candidate
was out for a week. The candidate was interested, the company was right, the job
function was right and the money was right. Since our client had to go out-of-town
the next week, by the time the candidate interviewed with the Vice President it
was Wednesday of the following week.
Meanwhile, our candidate was interviewing, not only on positions we were
referring him to, but on ones he had dug up for himself, and also on ones
other recruiters had arranged for him. Our client's attitude was that since
they had the best money, job, company, etc., the candidate would be around
when they were ready. As time went on, our candidate became more and more
lukewarm about the deal. He knew objectively that the job was a good one, but
he wasn't getting any reinforcement from our client. Even though we were
supplying positive enforcement for the "match", the candidate wasn't hearing
it from whom it counted: The client company.
Although we encouraged the district manager to interview others we were working
with, he was sold on the first candidate. The Vice President, however, thought it
was a good idea to talk to others as well. The manager we were working with never
asked his boss how he perceived the hiring process before they started and only
now discovered his boss wanted to interview at least one other candidate. The
district manager then called us, and needed to see more candidates, but still
insisted that they were going to hire the original candidate. We informed him
that the initial candidate was well into interviewing with others. Since an entire
month had passed and he had had only two interviews with our client, we had an
obligation to find him other interviews. The manager was sure the candidate would
accept an offer from them, but he could do that only after he presented his boss
with two more candidates.
It took another week to interview more candidates for his boss to review. An
additional week went by before the Vice President could talk to at least one
of the candidates. Although it was clear that the initial candidate was best,
they took another four days to schedule a time when they could get with him to
make an offer. The morning the meeting was to take place, our candidate accepted
an opportunity with another one of our clients. Our initial client was furious
with the candidate an unhappy with us.
What Happened
The job the candidate accepted really wasn't quite as good for him. This
company however, interviewed and hired within a week. They made him feel good
about them and their company. They hired an excellent candidate because they
had interviewed and hired expediently and with purpose. They had a need and
they appeared decisive to our candidate. They looked like they knew what they
were doing.
Our original client started all over and this time completed the whole
process in two weeks. They hired a good solid candidate who will do well.
He isn't as good as the original candidate, but he will do well.
The lesson to all of this is obvious. Candidates will change their minds or
make other choices. Just because a company offers a good solid opportunity for
a good employee doesn't mean every good candidate is going to wait for them to
decide. In fact, the longer the process goes on the more indecisive a firm
appears, no matter what the reasons.
Sell the Candidate
Good candidates need to be sold too. Once a good candidate is identified,
the hiring process has to be a two-way street. A good candidate will not
respond positively to a one-way street type of process. Hiring a good
candidate "just ain't over till it's over." Since it is a highly emotional
human endeavor, the process will rarely run as predicted.
To insure successful hiring, a firm needs to set a timetable for the
interviewing process. Schedules of all managers and officers involved
should be coordinated BEFORE the process begins. A short list of three
qualified candidates needs to be made so there is the insurance of backup
in case the primary or secondary candidates do other things, or change
their minds. We remind people all the time that our product in the placement
profession is one of the few products that can say "No" and often does. Taking
these initial planning steps will make the process flow easier, more
efficiently, and effectively.
back to the index page
|